On 07/24/2013 12:25 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> Searching for NR_umount finds the following packages that compile on
> Alpha:
>
> eglibc
Fork of glibc, which I did examine; I'll assume it's the same code.
> dietlibc
> uclibc
Rob reports that uclibc is fixed by the rename. From what I see in
the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:20:22AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> > I wondered if your proposal will break glibc as glibc checks for
> > __NR_oldumount and does different things based on that. But maybe your
> > fix will not adversely affect glibc (
On 07/22/2013 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> I wondered if your proposal will break glibc as glibc checks for
> __NR_oldumount and does different things based on that. But maybe your
> fix will not adversely affect glibc (I did not look particularly closely
> to see if so), but even so, there is
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:31:41PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 07:03:47 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:35:07PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> On 07/16/2013 12:04:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> >Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
>
On 07/16/2013 07:03:47 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:35:07PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 12:04:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
> >be controversial.
>
> I also note that I had to do this to get busyb
On 07/16/2013 09:29 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> I've got five patches in a for-linus branch on kernel.org that I was
> planning to send a pull request for soon. Would you like me to add
> these to that branch?
Yes, please.
r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
> be controversial.
Patches 1-5 and 7 (with the typo fixed) are
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Matt Turner
I don't know enough patch 6 to make any kind of meaningful review, so it
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:35:07PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 12:04:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
> >be controversial.
>
> I also note that I had to do this to get busybox to build against
> uClibc:
> -#define __NR_um
On 07/16/2013 12:04:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
be controversial.
I also note that I had to do this to get busybox to build against
uClibc:
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/unis
Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not
be controversial.
r~
The following changes since commit 47188d39b5deeebf41f87a02af1b3935866364cf:
Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 (2013-07-14 21:47:51
-0700)
are available i
10 matches
Mail list logo
