Re: [PATCH 0/7] Minor perf completion improvements

2013-07-15 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Ping? Does this series look alright? On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Hi, > > So I just started using perf, and noticed the accompanying completion > script. Having dabbled with git.git's completion script a bit, I > thought I should contribute what I learnt from it.

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Minor perf completion improvements

2013-07-05 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Namhyung Kim wrote: > So the whole point of this patchset is removing dependency, and no > functional change, right? Yep, and to lay the groundwork for extensibility: I would like to add ZSH support in a future patchset, for instance. > It'd be great if the completion script supports multiple eve

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Minor perf completion improvements

2013-07-04 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 18:11:24 +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Hi, > > So I just started using perf, and noticed the accompanying completion > script. Having dabbled with git.git's completion script a bit, I > thought I should contribute what I learnt from it. > > [6/7] is the meat of the series

[PATCH 0/7] Minor perf completion improvements

2013-07-04 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Hi, So I just started using perf, and noticed the accompanying completion script. Having dabbled with git.git's completion script a bit, I thought I should contribute what I learnt from it. [6/7] is the meat of the series, and the preceding patches work towards the same goal: to strip dependency