Rusty Russell wrote:
Yeah, after some more thought I've not applied most of this. We really
don't want to move everything then move it back; I prefer Jes' more
cautious approach of moving a little bit at a time.
We really have three parts: (1) bits that are generic, (2) bits that
should be
Rusty Russell wrote:
Yeah, after some more thought I've not applied most of this. We really
don't want to move everything then move it back; I prefer Jes' more
cautious approach of moving a little bit at a time.
We really have three parts: (1) bits that are generic, (2) bits that
should be
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 20:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move
> a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port
> is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes
> I would like
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 20:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move
a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port
is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes
I would like this
Hi all,
I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move
a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port
is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes
I would like this in upstream so I don't have to keep repeating my
changes :-)
Hi all,
I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move
a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port
is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes
I would like this in upstream so I don't have to keep repeating my
changes :-)
6 matches
Mail list logo