On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:25:55PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Ah, ok. I got it. I missed to send the first patch of my patchset:
:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://v
On 01/06/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I understand. Happy new year !
Happy new year to you too! :-)
ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
029632fbb7b7c ke
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I understand. Happy new year !
Happy new year to you too! :-)
> ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra 2011-10-
On 12/31/2013 05:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:44:46PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset does a cleanup on the parameters passed from the function
'trigger_load_balance' to the underneath functions.
Doesn't actually apply right.. will maybe spend more time ne
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:44:46PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patchset does a cleanup on the parameters passed from the function
> 'trigger_load_balance' to the underneath functions.
Doesn't actually apply right.. will maybe spend more time next week :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
This patchset does a cleanup on the parameters passed from the function
'trigger_load_balance' to the underneath functions.
The cpu is passed as parameter to the different functions as well as the struct
rq but this one contains already the cpu information. Moreover, in the call
stack for these fu
6 matches
Mail list logo
