Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: alloc utask/xol_area cleanups and minor fix

2013-01-09 Thread Anton Arapov
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 06:51:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello. > > This series fixes the minor bug and cleanups the usage of add_utask() > and xol_alloc_area(). Plus it cleanups the initializaion of ->utask > in handle_swbp() paths. > > Anton, this conflicts with your uretprobe patches,

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: alloc utask/xol_area cleanups and minor fix

2013-01-09 Thread Anton Arapov
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 06:51:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: Hello. This series fixes the minor bug and cleanups the usage of add_utask() and xol_alloc_area(). Plus it cleanups the initializaion of -utask in handle_swbp() paths. Anton, this conflicts with your uretprobe patches, but I

[PATCH 0/7] uprobes: alloc utask/xol_area cleanups and minor fix

2012-12-31 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. This series fixes the minor bug and cleanups the usage of add_utask() and xol_alloc_area(). Plus it cleanups the initializaion of ->utask in handle_swbp() paths. Anton, this conflicts with your uretprobe patches, but I think we should do this to avoid the code duplication. IOW, I consider

[PATCH 0/7] uprobes: alloc utask/xol_area cleanups and minor fix

2012-12-31 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. This series fixes the minor bug and cleanups the usage of add_utask() and xol_alloc_area(). Plus it cleanups the initializaion of -utask in handle_swbp() paths. Anton, this conflicts with your uretprobe patches, but I think we should do this to avoid the code duplication. IOW, I consider