From: David Howells
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:31:18 +
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> It depends upon whether you want the bug fixes to go into Linus's
>> tree for the current release or not.
>
> The fixes aren't particularly urgent, so if net-next is aimed at the next
> merge window, I would b
David Miller wrote:
> It depends upon whether you want the bug fixes to go into Linus's
> tree for the current release or not.
The fixes aren't particularly urgent, so if net-next is aimed at the next
merge window, I would be okay with you putting the whole pile in there at this
point.
Below is
From: David Howells
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:32:29 +
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> If you do, submit just the bug fixes against 'net'
>
> One more question: When you say "against 'net'", do you mean a particular
> branch of a git tree? If so, disregard the pull request I just sent you and
David Miller wrote:
> If you do, submit just the bug fixes against 'net'
One more question: When you say "against 'net'", do you mean a particular
branch of a git tree? If so, disregard the pull request I just sent you and
I'll rebase.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
From: David Howells
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:15:13 +
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> > Here are some AF_RXRPC fixes (to tag rxrpc-20140226):
>> ...
>> > And development patches (to tag rxrpc-devel-20140304):
>>
>> A mix of both bug fixes and new features
>
> I did ask whether you wanted
David Miller wrote:
> > Here are some AF_RXRPC fixes (to tag rxrpc-20140226):
> ...
> > And development patches (to tag rxrpc-devel-20140304):
>
> A mix of both bug fixes and new features
I did ask whether you wanted them in one or preferred them separate...
David
--
To unsubscribe from t
From: David Howells
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:46:15 +
> Here are some AF_RXRPC fixes (to tag rxrpc-20140226):
...
> And development patches (to tag rxrpc-devel-20140304):
A mix of both bug fixes and new features
You don't say at all what tree you are targetting this at, 'net' or
'net-n
Hi Dave,
Here are some AF_RXRPC fixes (to tag rxrpc-20140226):
(1) Fix to remove incorrect checksum calculation made during recvmsg(). It's
unnecessary to try to do this there since we check the checksum before
reading the RxRPC header from the packet.
(2) Fix to prevent the sendin
8 matches
Mail list logo