Vivek Goyal writes:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Concerns were expressed around (ab)using #PF for KVM's async_pf mechanism,
>> it seems that re-using #PF exception for a PV mechanism wasn't a great
>> idea after all. The Grand Plan is to switch to using e
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Concerns were expressed around (ab)using #PF for KVM's async_pf mechanism,
> it seems that re-using #PF exception for a PV mechanism wasn't a great
> idea after all. The Grand Plan is to switch to using e.g. #VE for 'page
> not pre
Vivek Goyal writes:
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> Are there any corresponding qemu patches as well to enable new
> functionality. Wanted to test it.
>
Yes, right you are, I forgot to even mention this in the blurb.
Please find patches against current 'master' attached. With '-cpu host'
the feature gets enabl
Hi Vitaly,
Are there any corresponding qemu patches as well to enable new
functionality. Wanted to test it.
Thanks
Vivek
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Concerns were expressed around (ab)using #PF for KVM's async_pf mechanism,
> it seems that re-using #PF exc
Concerns were expressed around (ab)using #PF for KVM's async_pf mechanism,
it seems that re-using #PF exception for a PV mechanism wasn't a great
idea after all. The Grand Plan is to switch to using e.g. #VE for 'page
not present' events and normal APIC interrupts for 'page ready' events.
This seri
5 matches
Mail list logo
