Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

2016-10-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-10-16, 14:20, Dave Gerlach wrote: > Cool, I'm reviewing these patches still but I definitely plan to test them > out on the TI platforms requiring multi-regulator support. At first glance > it looks like it does give us the hooks we need. I believe we can use > cpufreq-dt as is and just provi

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

2016-10-10 Thread Dave Gerlach
Hi, On 10/04/2016 06:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi, Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to change DVFS state of the device. This was explained well by Nishanth earlier [1]. Some thoughts went into it f

[PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

2016-10-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi, Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to change DVFS state of the device. This was explained well by Nishanth earlier [1]. Some thoughts went into it few months back but then it all got lost. I am tryi