On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:02:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Awesome, looks good, thanks Frederic!
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra
> >
> > Great! What do you prefer? Do you want to take these or should I do a pu
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:02:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Awesome, looks good, thanks Frederic!
> >
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra
>
> Great! What do you prefer? Do you want to take these or should I do a pull
> request
> to Ingo directly?
I had intended Ingo to pick these up; but
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:59:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:30:58AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patchset inspires from Peterz patch in
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137155182121860
> > to make perf retain the timer tick less oft
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:30:58AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset inspires from Peterz patch in
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137155182121860
> to make perf retain the timer tick less often, ie: only when there are freq
> events
> or when one throttles.
>
> The
Hi,
This patchset inspires from Peterz patch in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137155182121860
to make perf retain the timer tick less often, ie: only when there are freq
events
or when one throttles.
The main purpose is to make the lockup detector work with full dynticks, as I
suspect
tha
5 matches
Mail list logo