On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 09:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So when will be a good time to add the Kconfig patches to git390?
>
> Go wild.
>
> > And do you prefer to let them rot^H^H^Hmature in -mm for a while before
> > they can go upstream?
>
> Your call. I'd be inclined to push them early
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 09:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
So when will be a good time to add the Kconfig patches to git390?
Go wild.
And do you prefer to let them rot^H^H^Hmature in -mm for a while before
they can go upstream?
Your call. I'd be inclined to push them early personally -
On Wed, 09 May 2007 13:21:50 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
> > > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
> > > be
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
> > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
> > be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390.
> > The code does compile
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390.
The code does compile but
On Wed, 09 May 2007 13:21:50 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
be missing in
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:30:59 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > > scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:21:33 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
>>> Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Greetings,
I've added the
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> > about newly-added code
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:21:33 -0700
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:30:59 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:02:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:38:23 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In fact, I should probably munge it together with a similar thing
> > > I wrote at http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/findbugs/
> > > (Warning:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:38:23 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > > scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> > about newly-added code (and only
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> > about newly-added code
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
> whitespace, adds
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
> whitespace, adds new semaphores, adds
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:30:11 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that only applies to things which I merge. There's heaps of stuff
> coming in via the git trees which is obviously inadequately reviewed - look
> at all the instances of open-coded kernel_thread() which were merged
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:21:33 -0700
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
> > Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings,
> > > I've added the results of the review to the
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
> Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
> > for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:21:33 -0700
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:30:11 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that only applies to things which I merge. There's heaps of stuff
coming in via the git trees which is obviously inadequately reviewed - look
at all the instances of open-coded kernel_thread() which were merged
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
whitespace, adds new semaphores, adds new
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
whitespace, adds new
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only newly-added
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:38:23 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:24:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
scripts/spot-common-mistakes. Feed it a unified diff and it would
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:02:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:38:23 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, I should probably munge it together with a similar thing
I wrote at http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/findbugs/
(Warning: scary
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
> > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
> > be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390.
> > The code does compile
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390.
The code does compile but
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
> for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
> depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
>
>
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
> for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
> depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
>
They all look good to me now
-
To
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
git390 repository if that
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
git390 repository if that
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
They all look good to me now
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
Andrew:
40 matches
Mail list logo
