On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:25:42PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 04:03:26AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > [ . . . ]
> >
> > > I've given this a spin atop v5.11-rc4, building natively on arm64 on a
>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I've given this a spin atop v5.11-rc4, building natively on arm64 on a
> Debian 10.7 system, and with the whole series applied I'm able to run
> the rcutorture kvm.sh script without issue (the CONFIG warnings are
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 04:03:26AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > I've given this a spin atop v5.11-rc4, building natively on arm64 on a
> > Debian 10.7 system, and with the whole series applied I'm able to run
>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:17:14PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:54:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to
> > > > use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks.
> > >
> > > Makes
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:54:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to
> > > use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks.
> >
> > Makes sense. I was wondering, should we mark them for stable ? I don't
> > know
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:18:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > So FWIW:
> >
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland [arm64]
Thank you all!
> Perfect, thanks! Paul, may I let you copy-paste the tested-by yourself ?
> If you prefer I'm fine
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> So FWIW:
>
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland [arm64]
Perfect, thanks! Paul, may I let you copy-paste the tested-by yourself ?
If you prefer I'm fine with resending a series to you, I just don't want
to needlessly spam you :-)
> It would
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:05:48AM +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Thanks for having a look at this! And kuddos to Mark for nudging the
> right people.
Likewise to Paul for poking Willy!
Thanks all,
Mark.
Hi Willy, Paul,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:20:22AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> as per the recent discussion with Mark, I've updated the nolibc header to
> reflect latest upstream which is needed to build on arm64, and I performed
> the few cleanups that Mark rightfully suggested.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:05:48AM +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> This lets me run the following invocation without a hitch:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 10
> --configs "4*SRCU-P" --trust-make
>
> where before I would get some errors building the
On 21/01/21 08:20, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> as per the recent discussion with Mark, I've updated the nolibc header to
> reflect latest upstream which is needed to build on arm64, and I performed
> the few cleanups that Mark rightfully suggested.
>
> The following patches were taken from
Hi Paul,
as per the recent discussion with Mark, I've updated the nolibc header to
reflect latest upstream which is needed to build on arm64, and I performed
the few cleanups that Mark rightfully suggested.
The following patches were taken from the upstream code and this time I
carefully copied
12 matches
Mail list logo
