On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 08:04 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 08:38 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 12:56 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 26 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > > > This took
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 08:38 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 12:56 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > > This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
> > > >
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 12:56 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
> > > And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I d
On Fri, Oct 26 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
>> And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I don't
>> expect it to be included in this merge window and I won'
On Fri, Oct 26 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
>> And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I don't
>> expect it to be included in this merge window and I won'
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:43 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
> And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I don't
> expect it to be included in this merge window and I won't be at all
> impatient for review, but I didn
On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 12:04 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:43:54AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
> > And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I
> > don't
> > expect it to be included
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:43:54AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
> And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I don't
> expect it to be included in this merge window and I won't be at all
> impatient for review, but
This took longer that I had wanted, due to various reasons - sorry.
And I'm now posting it in a merge window, which is not ideal. I don't
expect it to be included in this merge window and I won't be at all
impatient for review, but I didn't want to delay it further.
Testing found some problems, p
9 matches
Mail list logo
