Hi Jan,
> > > > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > > > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
> > >
> > > That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> > > the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan spe
On Apr 5, 2005 6:45 AM, Jan Harkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
>
> That's what I had origin
Hi Dmitry,
> > People are also working on a replacement for the
> > current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
> > it close with the usb-serial for now.
> >
>
> Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have some of
> patches to firmware loader and wonder
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
> >
> > That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> > the IH
On Apr 5, 2005 9:36 AM, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People are also working on a replacement for the
> current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
> it close with the usb-serial for now.
>
Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have som
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> This ofcourse doesn't actually solve Debian's distribution issues since
> the keyspan firmware can only be distributed as part of 'Linux or other
> Open Source operating system kernel'.
Well, if this is the case, it
Hi Jan,
> > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
>
> That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan specific and there are
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format parser is
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Firmware loader is format-agnostic, I think having IHEX parser in a separate
> > file would be better...
>
> Why should this be in-kernel at all? Convert the firmware into a
Hi Jan,
> > > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > > >
> > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
> > > >
> > > > Can you summarize the conclusion of the thread, or what you did get
> > > > from it,
> > > > please ?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan f
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org
On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-leg
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
> >
> > Can you summarize the con
14 matches
Mail list logo
