On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:20:04AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:22:49PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > I've been kicking the tyres further on qspinlock and with this set of
> > > patches
> > > I'm happ
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:22:49PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I've been kicking the tyres further on qspinlock and with this set of
> > patches
> > I'm happy with the performance and fairness properties. In particular, the
> > lock
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been kicking the tyres further on qspinlock and with this set of patches
> I'm happy with the performance and fairness properties. In particular, the
> locking algorithm now guarantees forward progress whereas the impl
Hi all,
I've been kicking the tyres further on qspinlock and with this set of patches
I'm happy with the performance and fairness properties. In particular, the
locking algorithm now guarantees forward progress whereas the implementation
in mainline can starve threads indefinitely in cmpxchg loops
4 matches
Mail list logo