Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-29 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Mathieu, On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:33:08PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Hey Guennadi, > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:49:42AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > (re-sending, mailing list delivery attempts last Friday failed) > > > > I got your email on Friday but had to tend to

Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-28 Thread Mathieu Poirier
Hey Guennadi, On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:49:42AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > (re-sending, mailing list delivery attempts last Friday failed) > I got your email on Friday but had to tend to other things. > Hi Mathieu, > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:18:53PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier

Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-24 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:53:56AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > Sorry for a delayed response, after I'd sent that my message I've > subscribed to remoteproc and it seems during that transition some > messages were only delivered from the list and not directly to me >

Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-24 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Mathieu, Sorry for a delayed response, after I'd sent that my message I've subscribed to remoteproc and it seems during that transition some messages were only delivered from the list and not directly to me or something similar has happened. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:12:41PM -0600,

Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-22 Thread Mathieu Poirier
Good day Guennadi, On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 02:09, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > Thanks for the patches. I'm trying to understand the concept of > this approach and I'm probably failing at that. It seems to me > that this patch set is making the NS announcement service to a >

Re: [PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-22 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Mathieu, Thanks for the patches. I'm trying to understand the concept of this approach and I'm probably failing at that. It seems to me that this patch set is making the NS announcement service to a separate RPMsg device and I don't understand the reasoning for doing this. As far as I

[PATCH 00/10] rpmsg: Make RPMSG name service modular

2020-09-21 Thread Mathieu Poirier
Hi all, After looking at Guennadi[1] and Arnaud's patchsets[2] it became clear that we need to go back to a generic rpmsg_ns_msg structure if we wanted to make progress. To do that some of the work from Arnaud had to be modified in a way that common name service functionality was transport