Frans Pop wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>8472457 Total 30486950 +259% 30342823 +258%
>
> Hmmm. The table for previous versions looked a lot more impressive.
>
> now:8472457 Total +22014493 +259% +21870366 +258%
> V2 :7172678 Total+23314404 +325%
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>8472457 Total 30486950 +259% 30342823 +258%
Hmmm. The table for previous versions looked a lot more impressive.
now:8472457 Total+22014493 +259% +21870366 +258%
V2 :7172678 Total+23314404 +325% -147590 -2%
This patchset addresses the kernel bloat that occurs when NR_CPUS is increased.
The memory numbers below are with NR_CPUS = 1024 which I've been testing (4 and
32 real processors, the rest "possible" using the additional_cpus start option.)
These changes are all specific to the x86 architecture,
This patchset addresses the kernel bloat that occurs when NR_CPUS is increased.
The memory numbers below are with NR_CPUS = 1024 which I've been testing (4 and
32 real processors, the rest possible using the additional_cpus start option.)
These changes are all specific to the x86 architecture,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8472457 Total 30486950 +259% 30342823 +258%
Hmmm. The table for previous versions looked a lot more impressive.
now:8472457 Total+22014493 +259% +21870366 +258%
V2 :7172678 Total+23314404 +325% -147590 -2%
Frans Pop wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8472457 Total 30486950 +259% 30342823 +258%
Hmmm. The table for previous versions looked a lot more impressive.
now:8472457 Total +22014493 +259% +21870366 +258%
V2 :7172678 Total+23314404 +325%
6 matches
Mail list logo