On Friday 28 November 2014 12:31:12 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > > > Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the
> > > > series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch
> > > > below.
> > > >
On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > > Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the
> > > series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch
> > > below.
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:06:28 +0100
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> support for older Atmel SoCs.
> Again, for the record, it was announced here
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
>
On 28/11/2014 11:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2014 10:36:09 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 27
On Friday 28 November 2014 10:36:09 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >> On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> >>> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>>> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the
On Friday 28 November 2014 09:27:38 Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Friday 28 November 2014, 01:28:22 wrote Alexandre Belloni:
> > > > - sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
> > >
> > > This one seems fairly straightforward to do, including a DT
Hi Alexandre,
On Friday 28 November 2014, 01:28:22 wrote Alexandre Belloni:
> > > - sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
> >
> > This one seems fairly straightforward to do, including a DT binding,
> > but the result is still ugly as it supports the at32 chips
Hi Alexandre,
On Friday 28 November 2014, 01:28:22 wrote Alexandre Belloni:
- sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
This one seems fairly straightforward to do, including a DT binding,
but the result is still ugly as it supports the at32 chips that
do
On Friday 28 November 2014 09:27:38 Alexander Stein wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
On Friday 28 November 2014, 01:28:22 wrote Alexandre Belloni:
- sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
This one seems fairly straightforward to do, including a DT binding,
but
On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
On Friday 28 November 2014 10:36:09 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the
On 28/11/2014 11:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 28 November 2014 10:36:09 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:06:28 +0100
Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
Again, for the record, it was announced here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91:
On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the
series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch
below.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/246679.html
On Friday 28 November 2014 12:31:12 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the
series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch
below.
On 28/11/2014 at 00:12:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >
> > As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
> > multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
> > sam9 and
On Friday 28 November 2014 00:39:38 Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:12:25 +0100
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > >
> > > As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
> > >
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:12:25 +0100
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >
> > As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
> > multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
> >
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
> multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
> sam9 and rm9200.
I just looked at the drivers because I got curious, and to see
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > > This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> > > support for older Atmel SoCs.
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> > support for older Atmel SoCs.
> > Again, for the record, it was announced here
> >
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> support for older Atmel SoCs.
> Again, for the record, it was announced here
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
>
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
Again, for the record, it was announced here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
files) two months ago.
Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
Again, for the record, it was announced here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
files) two months ago.
Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
Again, for the record, it was announced here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
files)
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
Again, for the record, it was announced here
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
support for older Atmel SoCs.
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
sam9 and rm9200.
I just looked at the drivers because I got curious, and to see if
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:12:25 +0100
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
On Friday 28 November 2014 00:39:38 Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:12:25 +0100
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
On 28/11/2014 at 00:12:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
sam9 and rm9200.
I
32 matches
Mail list logo
