On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:43 PM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> The issue is this:
>
> static void bu21013_disable_chip(void *_ts)
> {
> struct bu21013_ts *ts = ts;
>
> which shuts up gcc about the fact that 'ts' is uninitialized, it should
> have said "ts = _ts". I guess it is a lesson for me t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:20 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
>
> > So your patch has prompted me to take a look at the driver and
> > try to clean it up. I am sure I screwed up somewhere, but you said
> > you have the device, so please
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:20 AM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> So your patch has prompted me to take a look at the driver and
> try to clean it up. I am sure I screwed up somewhere, but you said
> you have the device, so please take a look at the series and
> see if you can salvage them
I will funnel
Hi Linus,
So your patch has prompted me to take a look at the driver and
try to clean it up. I am sure I screwed up somewhere, but you said
you have the device, so please take a look at the series and
see if you can salvage them
Thanks!
Dmitry Torokhov (10):
ARM: ux500: improve BU21013 touchpa
4 matches
Mail list logo
