Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 03-06-16, 03:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 03, 2016 05:31:34 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > So, yeah, I get your overall concern. What about this: > > - A single patchset to make sure the current policy->freq_table is > > always sorted in Ascending order of frequencies. > > Be

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 03-06-16, 03:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 03, 2016 05:31:34 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > So, yeah, I get your overall concern. What about this: > > - A single patchset to make sure the current policy->freq_table is > > always sorted in Ascending order of frequencies. > > Be

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Friday, June 03, 2016 05:31:34 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 02-06-16, 22:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Quoting from this very cover letter "This change allows us to remove > > the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which > > was added by following series:", so why to add it in the first place? >

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Friday, June 03, 2016 05:31:34 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 02-06-16, 22:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Quoting from this very cover letter "This change allows us to remove > > the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which > > was added by following series:", so why to add it in the first place? >

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 02-06-16, 22:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Quoting from this very cover letter "This change allows us to remove > the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which > was added by following series:", so why to add it in the first place? Okay, that's fine. > Besides, there already is a number of tables

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 02-06-16, 22:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Quoting from this very cover letter "This change allows us to remove > the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which > was added by following series:", so why to add it in the first place? Okay, that's fine. > Besides, there already is a number of tables

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' >>> callback or in other words, which provide

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' >> callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' >> callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, >> to make sure they *only*

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' > callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, > to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to

Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' > callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, > to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to ->target_index() > with the

[PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

Hi Rafael, This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to ->target_index() with the policy->freq_table. This change allows us to remove the

[PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted

Hi Rafael, This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to ->target_index() with the policy->freq_table. This change allows us to remove the