Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-29 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Peter, On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:20:19 +0800 Peter Pan wrote: > Hi Ezequiel, > > Sorry for reply your mail late. And thaks a lot for reviewing it. > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Ezequiel Garcia > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 13 March 2016 at 23:47, Peter Pan wrote: > >> Sorry for send

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-28 Thread Peter Pan
Hi Ezequiel, Sorry for reply your mail late. And thaks a lot for reviewing it. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hello, > > On 13 March 2016 at 23:47, Peter Pan wrote: >> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past >> two month. >> >> Currently

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-28 Thread Peter Pan
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 + > Peter Pan wrote: > >> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past >> two month. >> >> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other >> NAND family chi

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-25 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 + Peter Pan wrote: > Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past > two month. > > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why > onenand has

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-23 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Hello, On 13 March 2016 at 23:47, Peter Pan wrote: > Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past > two month. > > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why > onenand has o

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-19 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Peter, On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:57:49 +0800 Peter Pan wrote: > Sorry I forgot to add subject prefix. Should I re-send it ? No that should be fine. Thanks for reworking this series as suggested. I'll try to review it soon. > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Peter Pan wrote: > > Sorry for

Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-13 Thread Peter Pan
Sorry I forgot to add subject prefix. Should I re-send it ? On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Peter Pan wrote: > Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past > two month. > > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > NAND family chips hard

[PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

2016-03-13 Thread Peter Pan
Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past two month. Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c). Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code