[PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup around kvm_sync_page, and a few micro-optimizations

2016-02-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
This series started from looking at mmu_unsync_walk for the ubsan thread. Patches 1 and 2 are the result of the discussions in that thread. Patches 3 to 9 do more cleanups in __kvm_sync_page and its callers. Among other changes, it removes kvm_sync_page_transient and avoids duplicate code between

Re: [PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup around kvm_sync_page, and a few micro-optimizations

2016-03-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 24/02/2016 14:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > This series started from looking at mmu_unsync_walk for the ubsan thread. > Patches 1 and 2 are the result of the discussions in that thread. > > Patches 3 to 9 do more cleanups in __kvm_sync_page and its callers. > Among other changes, it removes kvm_

Re: [PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup around kvm_sync_page, and a few micro-optimizations

2016-02-25 Thread Xiao Guangrong
On 02/24/2016 09:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: This series started from looking at mmu_unsync_walk for the ubsan thread. Patches 1 and 2 are the result of the discussions in that thread. Patches 3 to 9 do more cleanups in __kvm_sync_page and its callers. Among other changes, it removes kvm_sync_

Re: [PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup around kvm_sync_page, and a few micro-optimizations

2016-02-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 25/02/2016 09:28, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > BTW, is any conflict to apply my page-tracking patchset on top of this > patchset (i noticed you've merged this patchset on kvm/queue)? Please > tell me to rebase it if it is needed. No, there shouldn't be any conflict. Paolo