Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

On Tuesday 30 August 2016 09:31 PM, Nilay Vaish wrote: On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include platform specific PMU registers. Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch It's a perennial

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

On Tuesday 30 August 2016 09:31 PM, Nilay Vaish wrote: On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include platform specific PMU registers. Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch It's a perennial request from hardware folks

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include > platform specific PMU registers. > > Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch > > It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to > see the

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include > platform specific PMU registers. > > Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch > > It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to > see the raw values of the pmu

[PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include platform specific PMU registers. Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to see the raw values of the pmu registers. Partly it's so that they can verify perf is doing what they

[PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include platform specific PMU registers. Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to see the raw values of the pmu registers. Partly it's so that they can verify perf is doing what they