On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>> > Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
>> > block-core's bio splitting
On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>> > Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
>> > block-core's bio splitting infrastructure in DM. Been
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
> > block-core's bio splitting infrastructure in DM. Been meaning to do
> > that for quite
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
> > block-core's bio splitting infrastructure in DM. Been meaning to do
> > that for quite a while anyway.
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 2:44pm -0500,
NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> >> NeilBrown wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 2:44pm -0500,
NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> >> NeilBrown wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
> block-core's bio splitting infrastructure in DM. Been meaning to do
> that for quite a while anyway. This mail from you just made it all
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:43am -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Decided it a better use of my time to review and then hopefully use the
> block-core's bio splitting infrastructure in DM. Been meaning to do
> that for quite a while anyway. This mail from you just made it all the
> more clear that
On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
>> NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > But I've now queued
On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
>> NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > But I've now queued this patch for once Linus gets back
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:10am -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> > NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > > Please see
> > >
On Tue, Nov 21 2017 at 7:10am -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> > NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > > Please see
> > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-August/msg00310.html
>
> I'll
On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > But I've now queued this patch for once Linus gets back (reverts DM
> > >
On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 8:35pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
> NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > But I've now queued this patch for once Linus gets back (reverts DM
> > > changes from commit 47e0fb461f):
> > >
On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is
On Mon, Nov 20 2017 at 7:34pm -0500,
NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a resend of my series of patches
On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
This is a resend of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
On Mon, Nov 20 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
This is a resend of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
This
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> This is a resend of my series of patches working
>>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>>>
>>> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>>>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:36 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> This is a resend of my series of patches working
>>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>>>
>>> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>>>
>>> It
On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>> This is a resend of my series of patches working
>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>>
>> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>>
>> It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
>>
On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>> This is a resend of my series of patches working
>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>>
>> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>>
>> It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
>>
On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a resend of my series of patches working
> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>
> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>
> It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
> resent following feedback on the last set.
>
> It
On Sun, Jun 18 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a resend of my series of patches working
> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>
> This set is based on for-4.13/block.
>
> It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
> resent following feedback on the last set.
>
> It
On Fri, Jun 16 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>>> me to re-post all the patches?
>>
>> I personally prefer to always
On Fri, Jun 16 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>>> me to re-post all the patches?
>>
>> I personally prefer to always
On Fri, Jun 16 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>>> me to re-post all the patches?
>>
>> I personally prefer to always
On Fri, Jun 16 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>>> me to re-post all the patches?
>>
>> I personally prefer to always
This is a resend of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
This set is based on for-4.13/block.
It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
resent following feedback on the last set.
It also includes a minor grammatic improvement to a
This is a resend of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
This set is based on for-4.13/block.
It incorporates the revised versions of all the patches that were
resent following feedback on the last set.
It also includes a minor grammatic improvement to a
On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>> me to re-post all the patches?
>
> I personally prefer to always have patches on the list, but I can't
> speak
On 06/16/2017 01:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
>> me to re-post all the patches?
>
> I personally prefer to always have patches on the list, but I can't
> speak
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
> me to re-post all the patches?
I personally prefer to always have patches on the list, but I can't
speak for Jens of course.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> I've pushed the new version to the same place. Do you actually want
> me to re-post all the patches?
I personally prefer to always have patches on the list, but I can't
speak for Jens of course.
On Thu, Jun 15 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:54:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> I didn't hear back ... have you had a chance to look?
>> In case it helps, you can pull the full set, based on a recent Linus tree,
>> from
>>
On Thu, Jun 15 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:54:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> I didn't hear back ... have you had a chance to look?
>> In case it helps, you can pull the full set, based on a recent Linus tree,
>> from
>>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:54:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> I didn't hear back ... have you had a chance to look?
> In case it helps, you can pull the full set, based on a recent Linus tree,
> from
> git://neil.brown.name/linux bioset
>
> or I can resend the patches if you
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:54:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> I didn't hear back ... have you had a chance to look?
> In case it helps, you can pull the full set, based on a recent Linus tree,
> from
> git://neil.brown.name/linux bioset
>
> or I can resend the patches if you
On Thu, May 11 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, May 02 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>> This is a revision of my series of patches working
>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>
> Hi Jens,
> could I get some feed-back about your thoughts on this series?
> Will you apply it? When? Do I need
On Thu, May 11 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, May 02 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>> This is a revision of my series of patches working
>> towards removing the bioset work queues.
>
> Hi Jens,
> could I get some feed-back about your thoughts on this series?
> Will you apply it? When? Do I need
On Tue, May 02 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a revision of my series of patches working
> towards removing the bioset work queues.
Hi Jens,
could I get some feed-back about your thoughts on this series?
Will you apply it? When? Do I need to resend anything?
Would you like a git-pull
On Tue, May 02 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a revision of my series of patches working
> towards removing the bioset work queues.
Hi Jens,
could I get some feed-back about your thoughts on this series?
Will you apply it? When? Do I need to resend anything?
Would you like a git-pull
This is a revision of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
This set is based on Linus' tree as for today (2nd May) plus
the for-linus branch from Shaohua's md/raid tree.
This series adds a fix for the new lightnvm/pblk-read code
and discards
This is a revision of my series of patches working
towards removing the bioset work queues.
This set is based on Linus' tree as for today (2nd May) plus
the for-linus branch from Shaohua's md/raid tree.
This series adds a fix for the new lightnvm/pblk-read code
and discards
44 matches
Mail list logo