Hello, Lai.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:19:26AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > Can't we just make get_work_pool_id() do a fast path if OFFQ than
> > requiring the user to distinguish off and on queue cases?
>
> old code, get_work_pool_id() is only called when offq.
> after series applied, offq_wo
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Lai.
>
> Generally, I *really* like where you're headed but like before it's a
> bit difficult for me to apply the patches as-is. Please read on.
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:41:23AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Better Locking:
>> main
Hello, Lai.
Generally, I *really* like where you're headed but like before it's a
bit difficult for me to apply the patches as-is. Please read on.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:41:23AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Better Locking:
> mainly based on *mb() which is the most dangerous code and bad for
Better Locking:
-
We have a much complex way to find out on which pool a given work is queued on,
mainly based on *mb() which is the most dangerous code and bad for readability.
This series change the usage of CWQ bit and makes these code simpler.
--PATCH 3,4,5
We have get_work_po
4 matches
Mail list logo
