On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:51:51PM -0800, Michael Rubin wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 4:36 AM, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies.
> > The main goals are:
> >
> > (1) small files should not be starved by big dirty file
On Jan 15, 2008 4:36 AM, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies.
> The main goals are:
>
> (1) small files should not be starved by big dirty files
> (2) sync as fast as possible for not-blocked inodes/pages
> - don't l
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:33:01AM -0800, Michael Rubin wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 4:36 AM, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies.
>
> Anyone know which tree is this patched based out of?
They are against the latest
On Jan 15, 2008 4:36 AM, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies.
Anyone know which tree is this patched based out of?
> The main goals are:
>
> (1) small files should not be starved by big dirty files
> (2) sync as fast a
Andrew,
This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies.
The main goals are:
(1) small files should not be starved by big dirty files
(2) sync as fast as possible for not-blocked inodes/pages
- don't leave them out; no congestion_wait() in between them
(3) avoid busy iowait for b
5 matches
Mail list logo