On Tuesday 30 October 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > was there something that caught your eye other than the ugly udelay()
> > you mentioned in the other thread ?
>
> That one was a feature that might be more generally necessary,
> just to meet chip timing specs. Mostly they're no trouble.
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 10/30/07, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And also, pay closer attention to when you may be making
> > changes that make device drivers work differently over
> > your spi_master controller driver than anyone elses ...
> > such
On 10/30/07, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And also, pay closer attention to when you may be making
> changes that make device drivers work differently over
> your spi_master controller driver than anyone elses ...
> such platform-specific behaviors are undesirable, and when
> they
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Bryan Wu wrote:
> - BF54x supported
> - multi-port supported
> - bunch of bug fixing
OK, I forwarded these with some more checkpatch.pl fixes.
But as I commented elsewhere, please work harder to make sure
that your patch comments actually match the patches!!
And
- BF54x supported
- multi-port supported
- bunch of bug fixing
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
- BF54x supported
- multi-port supported
- bunch of bug fixing
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Bryan Wu wrote:
- BF54x supported
- multi-port supported
- bunch of bug fixing
OK, I forwarded these with some more checkpatch.pl fixes.
But as I commented elsewhere, please work harder to make sure
that your patch comments actually match the patches!!
And
On 10/30/07, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also, pay closer attention to when you may be making
changes that make device drivers work differently over
your spi_master controller driver than anyone elses ...
such platform-specific behaviors are undesirable, and when
they go
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 10/30/07, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also, pay closer attention to when you may be making
changes that make device drivers work differently over
your spi_master controller driver than anyone elses ...
such
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, David Brownell wrote:
was there something that caught your eye other than the ugly udelay()
you mentioned in the other thread ?
That one was a feature that might be more generally necessary,
just to meet chip timing specs. Mostly they're no trouble.
...
10 matches
Mail list logo
