On 05/02/2017 11:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:53:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Also, the following occurred to me:
>>
>> sg_span & sg_mask == sg_mask
>>
>> Therefore, we don't need to do the whole "sg_span &" business.
>>
>> Hmm?
>> @@ -856,7 +857,7 @@ build_sc
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:53:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also, the following occurred to me:
>
> sg_span & sg_mask == sg_mask
>
> Therefore, we don't need to do the whole "sg_span &" business.
>
> Hmm?
> @@ -856,7 +857,7 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *
>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:30:05PM -0300, Lauro Venancio wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 10:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Also, the following occurred to me:
> >
> > sg_span & sg_mask == sg_mask
> >
> > Therefore, we don't need to do the whole "sg_span &" business.
> >
> > Hmm?
> Agreed. Maybe we have
On 04/28/2017 10:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:19:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> These patches are based upon the hard work of Lauro. He put in the time and
>> effort to understand and debug the code.
>>
>> So while I didn't take many of his actual patche
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:19:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These patches are based upon the hard work of Lauro. He put in the time and
> effort to understand and debug the code.
>
> So while I didn't take many of his actual patches; I want to thank him for
> doing the work. Hopeful
Hi,
These patches are based upon the hard work of Lauro. He put in the time and
effort to understand and debug the code.
So while I didn't take many of his actual patches; I want to thank him for
doing the work. Hopefully the "Debugged-by:" tag conveys some of that.
In any case, please have a lo
6 matches
Mail list logo
