On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:24:56AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Yes, agree totally, i386 _requires_ asm/segment.h. It is used in
> low-level trap handling and bootup code from assembly files. In
> addition,
but keeping the header under that name will just encorage people
to put it back into
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-08-24 at 11:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
The following set of patches removes the use and existence of
asm/segment.h from the architecture ports
You've broken various things by doing this because some driver code
rightly or wrongly uses segment.h. That is
On Aug 24, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-08-24 at 11:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
The following set of patches removes the use and existence of
asm/segment.h from the architecture ports
You've broken various things by doing this because some driver code
rightly or wrongly u
On Mer, 2005-08-24 at 11:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The following set of patches removes the use and existence of
> asm/segment.h from the architecture ports
You've broken various things by doing this because some driver code
rightly or wrongly uses segment.h. That is fine because they should
The following set of patches removes the use and existence of
asm/segment.h from the architecture ports that it was fairly trivial to do
so. I need to work with the arch maintainers on the following
architectures since they use asm/segment.h heavily:
m32r
um
frv
h8300
i386
m68knommu
m68k
v850
5 matches
Mail list logo
