Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-13 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 12/10/15 21:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, October 11, 2015 11:01:17 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI >>> layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to >>>

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 11:01:17 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI > > layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to > > this problem, I've decided to reset the counter

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-12 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 11/10/15 22:01, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI >> layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to >> this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...] >> >> The irqdomai

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-12 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 10/12/2015 10:40 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: On 10/12/2015 05:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to this problem, I've decided to r

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-11 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 10/12/2015 05:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...] The irqdomain code i

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: > [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI > layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to > this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...] > > The irqdomain code is not entierely ACPI friendly, as it has

[PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node

2015-10-06 Thread Marc Zyngier
[This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...] The irqdomain code is not entierely ACPI friendly, as it has some built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothi