Hi,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:43:34PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> While the sched-numa code is relatively small and clean, the
> current version does not seem to offer a significant
> performance improvement over not having it, and in one of
> the tests performance actually regresses vs. mainlin
On 08/08/2012 01:17 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi everyone,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:12:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi all,
After having had a talk with Rik about all this NUMA nonsense where he proposed
the scheme implemented in the next to last patch, I came up with a related
means
Hi everyone,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:12:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After having had a talk with Rik about all this NUMA nonsense where he
> proposed
> the scheme implemented in the next to last patch, I came up with a related
> means of doing the home-node selection.
>
>
Hi all,
After having had a talk with Rik about all this NUMA nonsense where he proposed
the scheme implemented in the next to last patch, I came up with a related
means of doing the home-node selection.
I've also switched to (ab)using PROT_NONE for driving the migration faults.
These patches go
4 matches
Mail list logo