Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:46 + Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 + Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Yes, please share. > > > > > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa > > > > Thanks

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-17 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:46 + Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 + Lee Jones wrote: > > > Yes, please share. > > > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa > > Thanks for this. > > Oh, I see. So you conduct tests locally,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-16 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 + Lee Jones wrote: > > > Jakub can explain how he added these checks. > > > > Yes, please share. > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa Thanks for this. Oh, I see. So you conduct tests locally, then post them up in

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-15 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 + Lee Jones wrote: > > Jakub can explain how he added these checks. > > Yes, please share. https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:00:42PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Andrew Lunn (2021-02-13 08:04:34) > > > > I'm trying to see if we can make lives better for everyone by exposing > > > > the warnings by default in the drivers/clk/ directory now

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-14 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:00:42PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Andrew Lunn (2021-02-13 08:04:34) > > > I'm trying to see if we can make lives better for everyone by exposing > > > the warnings by default in the drivers/clk/ directory now that there are > > > supposedly none left.

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-13 Thread Andrew Lunn
> I'm trying to see if we can make lives better for everyone by exposing > the warnings by default in the drivers/clk/ directory now that there are > supposedly none left. Shouldn't we tighten the screws now that we've > cleaned them? Do you use patchwork? netdev has a bot attached which applies

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-13 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:07:30PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 14:37:39) > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > I'd like to enable it for only files under drivers/clk/ but it doesn't > > seem to work. I'm not asking to enable it at the toplevel Makefile. I'm > > asking to enable it for drivers/clk/ so nobody has

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 13:26:30) > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > The alternative is to not worry about it and review the slow drip of > > > fixes that will occur as a result. The issues I just fixed were built > > > up over

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 13:26:30) > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > The alternative is to not worry about it and review the slow drip of > > fixes that will occur as a result. The issues I just fixed were built > > up over years. They won't get to that level again. > > > > In

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 01:20:16) > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > > > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 01:20:16) > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-12 01:20:16) > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds, which are currently

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-11 13:10:54) > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings.

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > This is the last set. Clock is clean after

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-01-26 04:45:19) > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > niggly little warnings. > > This is the last set. Clock is clean after this. Is it possible to slam in some patch that

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-07 Thread Tero Kristo
On 26/01/2021 14:45, Lee Jones wrote: This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. This is the last set. Clock is clean after this. Lee Jones (21): clk: zynq: pll: Fix kernel-doc

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-03 00:31:55) > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings.

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-05 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Lee Jones (2021-02-03 00:31:55) > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > This is the last set. Clock is clean after

Re: [PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-02-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > niggly little warnings. > > This is the last set. Clock is clean after this. Out of interest, what normally happens to the

[PATCH 00/21] [Set 2] Rid W=1 warnings from Clock

2021-01-26 Thread Lee Jones
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. This is the last set. Clock is clean after this. Lee Jones (21): clk: zynq: pll: Fix kernel-doc formatting in 'clk_register_zynq_pll's