On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 01:29:16PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:23 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:41:28PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > I can confirm that all the warnings I previously saw are now fixed,
> > > but I'm seeing a few new
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:23 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:41:28PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > I can confirm that all the warnings I previously saw are now fixed,
> > but I'm seeing a few new ones:
> >
> > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:41:28PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> I can confirm that all the warnings I previously saw are now fixed,
> but I'm seeing a few new ones:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: balance_leaf_when_delete()+0x17d4: stack state
> mismatch: cfa1=7+192 cfa2=7+176
> vmlinux.o:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:59 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:19:16PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: balance_leaf_when_delete()+0x17d4: stack
> > > > state mismatch: cfa1=7+192 cfa2=7+176
> > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:19:16PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: balance_leaf_when_delete()+0x17d4: stack
> > > state mismatch: cfa1=7+192 cfa2=7+176
> > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: internal_move_pointers_items()+0x9f7:
> > > stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+160
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:52 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:41:28PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > >
> > > Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> > > Sami's
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:41:28PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> > Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
> >
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I tried this series on top of clang-cfi and it segfaults here.
> > >
> > > + info OBJTOOL vmlinux.o
> > > + [ != silent_ ]
> > > + printf %-7s %s\n OBJTOOL vmlinux.o
> > > OBJTOOL vmlinux.o
> > > + tools/objtool/objtool orc
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:30 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 5:51 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > >
> > > Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> > > Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 5:51 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> > Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
> > objtool anyway, for other
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 5:51 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> > Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
> > objtool anyway, for other
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
> objtool anyway, for other reasons.)
>
> This isn't 100% done -- most notably, crypto still
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:41 PM Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>
> I can confirm that all the warnings I previously saw are now fixed,
> but I'm seeing a few new ones:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: balance_leaf_when_delete()+0x17d4: stack
> state mismatch: cfa1=7+192 cfa2=7+176
> vmlinux.o: warning:
Hi Josh,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
> Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
> objtool anyway, for other reasons.)
>
> This isn't 100% done -- most notably,
Add support for proper vmlinux.o validation, which will be needed for
Sami's upcoming x86 LTO set. (And vmlinux validation is the future for
objtool anyway, for other reasons.)
This isn't 100% done -- most notably, crypto still needs to be supported
-- but I think this gets us most of the way
15 matches
Mail list logo