Re: [PATCH 00/23] printk: refactoring

2012-10-18 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > It wouldn't hurt to describe the design here a bit. How was the code > partitioned and what is the role of each file? > > That's reasonably obvious from the names, but some might wonder about > the difference between printk_log and printk_

Re: [PATCH 00/23] printk: refactoring

2012-10-18 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:06:04 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > Make printk a bit more readable. [] > OK, nobody's allowed to change the printk code for two months. [filelist] > It wouldn't hurt to describe the design here a bit. How was

Re: [PATCH 00/23] printk: refactoring

2012-10-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:06:04 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > Make printk a bit more readable. > > Joe Perches (23): > printk: Move to separate directory for easier modification > printk: Add console_cmdline.h > printk: Move braille console support into separate braille.[ch] files > printk: Us

[PATCH 00/23] printk: refactoring

2012-10-16 Thread Joe Perches
Make printk a bit more readable. Joe Perches (23): printk: Move to separate directory for easier modification printk: Add console_cmdline.h printk: Move braille console support into separate braille.[ch] files printk: Use pointer for console_cmdline indexing printk: rename struct log to