On 28/09/15 23:33, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:15:31PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
>
> Thanks, applied all but:
>
> [PATCH 17/25] perf callchain: Allow for max_stack greater than
>
On 28/09/15 23:33, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:15:31PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
>
> Thanks, applied all but:
>
> [PATCH 17/25] perf callchain: Allow for max_stack greater than
>
Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:15:31PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Hi
>
> Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
Thanks, applied all but:
[PATCH 17/25] perf callchain: Allow for max_stack greater than
PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH
Please take a look at the comments I made on
Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:15:31PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Hi
>
> Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
Thanks, applied all but:
[PATCH 17/25] perf callchain: Allow for max_stack greater than
PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH
Please take a look at the comments I made on
Hi
Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
First 3 patches are minor fixes:
perf auxtrace: Fix 'instructions' period of zero
perf report: Fix sample type validation for synthesized callchains
perf intel-pt: Fix potential loop forever
Next 4 are minor
Hi
Here are some minor improvements to Intel PT related stuff.
First 3 patches are minor fixes:
perf auxtrace: Fix 'instructions' period of zero
perf report: Fix sample type validation for synthesized callchains
perf intel-pt: Fix potential loop forever
Next 4 are minor
6 matches
Mail list logo