On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:50:42 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:03 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Saturday February 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > What is the NFS and net people's take on all of this?
> >
> > Well I'm only vaguely an NFS person, ba
> > > > mm-page_file_methods.patch
> > > >
> > > > This makes page_offset and others more expensive by adding a
> > > > conditional jump to a function call that is not usually made.
> > > >
> > > > Why do swap pages have a different index to everyone else?
> > >
> > > Because the pag
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:29 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > mm-page_file_methods.patch
> > >
> > > This makes page_offset and others more expensive by adding a
> > > conditional jump to a function call that is not usually made.
> > >
> > > Why do swap pages have a different index
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:29 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > mm-page_file_methods.patch
> > >
> > > This makes page_offset and others more expensive by adding a
> > > conditional jump to a function call that is not usually made.
> > >
> > > Why do swap pages have a different index
> > mm-page_file_methods.patch
> >
> > This makes page_offset and others more expensive by adding a
> > conditional jump to a function call that is not usually made.
> >
> > Why do swap pages have a different index to everyone else?
>
> Because the page->index of an anonymous page is
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:50 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > mm-reserve.patch
> >
> >I'm confused by __mem_reserve_add.
> >
> > + reserve = mem_reserve_root.pages;
> > + __calc_reserve(res, pages, 0);
> > + reserve = mem_reserve_root.pages - reserve;
> >
> >__calc_reserve will al
Hi Neil,
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:03 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday February 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is the NFS and net people's take on all of this?
>
> Well I'm only vaguely an NFS person, barely a net person, sporadically
> an mm person, but I've had a look and it seem
On Saturday February 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:46:10 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
>
> Well I looked. There's rather a lot of it and I wouldn't pretend to
> understand it.
But pretending is fu
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:46:10 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Well I looked. There's rather a lot of it and I wouldn't pretend to
understand it.
What is the NFS and net people's take on all of this?
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
[ patches against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1, also to be found online at:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/v2.6.25-rc2-mm1/ ]
The patch-set can be split in roug
10 matches
Mail list logo
