Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-25 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 14/4/25 下午4:37, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > > >> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:06 PM, "Chung-Lin Tang" >> wrote: >> >>> On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote: >>> >>> > On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: > >> On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > I'll try to explain a probable situation for Nios II. I'm not sure about > other soft-cores, but nios2 is sort of uncommon in that the maximum > alignment is 4-bytes (32-bits), even for doubles/long-longs. FWIW, that's the same as on m32r.

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-25 Thread Pinski, Andrew
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:06 PM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: > >> On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote: >> >> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" wrote: > On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-24 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > > >> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" >> wrote: >> >>> On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >> On 201

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-24 Thread Pinski, Andrew
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: > >> On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > >>> O

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-24 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >> On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote: >> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" >> wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-24 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > > On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > >> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: > > >> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-24 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote: >> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" wrote: >> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-23 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > >> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" >> > wrote: >> > >>> >> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-23 Thread H. Peter Anvin
I think Linuxs said we should just fix POSIX on that front. On April 23, 2014 11:15:34 AM PDT, "Pinski, Andrew" wrote: > > >> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: >> >>> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann >wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-23 Thread Pinski, Andrew
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang" > wrote: > >> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >> >> Other than 64-bit time_t

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-23 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >>> >> >>> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm >>> >> that we don't need t

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-22 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >>> >>> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm >>> that we don't need to have 64 bit

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-22 Thread Ley Foon Tan
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm >> that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below. >> I can submit t

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-22 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: > Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, > > Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm > that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below. > I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes > (include/asm-generic/pos

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-22 Thread Ley Foon Tan
Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below. I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes (include/asm-generic/posix_types.h and other archs) if everyone is agreed on this. Excerp

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-21 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 14/4/21 1:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/20/2014 10:23 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that any new architecture

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-20 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 04/20/2014 10:23 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that >>> any new architecture ports should use a 64-bit time_t? >> >> No, unf

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-20 Thread Ley Foon Tan
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that >> any new architecture ports should use a 64-bit time_t? > > No, unfortunately not. With my rule that every architectur

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/18/2014 05:26 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > This patchset adds the Linux kernel port for Nios II processor from Altera. > > The nios2 Linux port follows the guidance for new architecture ports using > > generic headers (including unistd.h). > >

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-18 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 04/18/2014 05:26 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > This patchset adds the Linux kernel port for Nios II processor from Altera. > The nios2 Linux port follows the guidance for new architecture ports using > generic headers (including unistd.h). Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' gu

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-18 Thread Ley Foon Tan
Okay, I already submitted the remaining 4 patches. Thanks. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > Hi all > > I just found that 4 patches (03/28, 05/28,07/28 and 14/28) are missing > here, because the issue in Git v1.8.3.2. But, the cover letter is correct. > Do I need to resend t

Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-18 Thread Ley Foon Tan
Hi all I just found that 4 patches (03/28, 05/28,07/28 and 14/28) are missing here, because the issue in Git v1.8.3.2. But, the cover letter is correct. Do I need to resend the whole series (28 patches) or just the missing 4 patches? Thanks. Regards. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Ley Foon Tan

[PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

2014-04-18 Thread Ley Foon Tan
This patchset adds the Linux kernel port for Nios II processor from Altera. The nios2 Linux port follows the guidance for new architecture ports using generic headers (including unistd.h). About Nios II Cores --- Nios II is a 32-bit embedded-processor architecture designed specific