Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

2017-04-20 Thread Doug Ledford
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 23:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > > I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it, > > you > > need to respin it with the following changes: > > How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions > which you do not find controversial

Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

2017-04-20 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> I've dropped this entire series. If you want me to consider it, you > need to respin it with the following changes: How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment? > 1) Put all similar corrections in a singl

Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

2017-04-20 Thread Doug Ledford
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 21:45 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:34:32 +0100 > > Several update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it, you need to respi

[PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

2017-02-18 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:34:32 +0100 Several update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (29): Use kcalloc() in mlx4_ib_alloc_pv_bufs() Improve another size determination in mlx4_ib_alloc_pv_bufs() Improve another size d