On Thursday, August 08, 2013 07:18:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This is actually part of a bigger patchset which will change declaration of
> cpufreq_driver->target() to include index instead of target_freq and relation
> and hence cpufreq drivers wouldn't require to cpufreq_frequency_table_target()
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 07:23:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 19:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I'm not going to take this for 3.12, sorry. Please resend in the 3.12-rc1 /
> > 3.12-rc2 time frame.
>
> Okay.. By that time I will accumulate all reviews/Acks for it
> and the nex
On 8 August 2013 19:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm not going to take this for 3.12, sorry. Please resend in the 3.12-rc1 /
> 3.12-rc2 time frame.
Okay.. By that time I will accumulate all reviews/Acks for it
and the next patchset that I will send.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
This is actually part of a bigger patchset which will change declaration of
cpufreq_driver->target() to include index instead of target_freq and relation
and hence cpufreq drivers wouldn't require to cpufreq_frequency_table_target()
anymore.
Almost every cpufreq driver is required to validate its
4 matches
Mail list logo
