Hi Andi, hi everyone,
thank you for reviewing and waiting. I had a small personal hiatus over
Easter but now I am back. This series needs another cycle, so no need to
hurry. I will address some of the review comments but not all. The
conversion (and API improvements) are some bigger tasks, so
Hi Wolfram,
> > @Andi: are you okay with this approach? It means you'd need to merge
> > -rc2 into your for-next branch. Or rebase if all fails.
>
> I think it's a good plan, I'll try to support you with it.
Do you feel more comfortable if I take the patches as soon as
they are reviewd?
So far
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:24:53PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Okay, we need to begin somewhere...
>
> Start changing the wording of the I2C main header wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. This first step
Okay, we need to begin somewhere...
Start changing the wording of the I2C main header wrt. the newest I2C
v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
appropriate terms. This first step renames the members of struct
i2c_algorithm. Once all in-tree users are converted,
4 matches
Mail list logo
