On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:46:44PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Dominik Brodowski
> > Sent: 29 March 2018 15:42
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:20:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > > At least on 64-bit x86, it will
From: Dominik Brodowski
> Sent: 29 March 2018 15:42
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:20:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > At least on 64-bit x86, it will likely be a hard requirement from v4.17
> > > onwards to not call system
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:20:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > At least on 64-bit x86, it will likely be a hard requirement from v4.17
> > onwards to not call system call functions in the kernel: It is better to
> > use use a
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> At least on 64-bit x86, it will likely be a hard requirement from v4.17
> onwards to not call system call functions in the kernel: It is better to
> use use a different calling convention for system calls there, where
> struct pt
[ While most parts of this patch set have been sent out already at least
once, I send out *all* patches to lkml once again as this whole series
touches several different subsystems in sensitive areas. ]
System calls are interaction points between userspace and the kernel.
Therefore, system cal
5 matches
Mail list logo
