On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > 83 files changed, 3742 insertions(+), 2841 deletions(-)
>>
>> How much of this is just the added instrumentation? [...]
>
> Half of it is that, plus a lot
* Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hey Ingo,
>
> This throws a warning if I try to run one of my MPX programs:
>
> > [ 22.907739] [ cut here ]
> > [ 22.907776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 500 at
> > /home/davehans/linux.git/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:324
> > fpu__activate_stopped+0x
Hello,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Please have a look.
I've been running this for ~ 2 weeks. I've only seen one issue, when
emerging mesa 10.5.6:
[May26 20:41] traps: aclocal-1.15[27452] trap invalid opcode
ip:7f6331031ab0 sp:7ffe73ece880 error:0 in
libperl.so.5.20.2[7f6330f18000+19e000]
[ +0.51
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [Second part of the series - Gmail didn't like me sending so many mails.]
Just a quick update: I merged these patches to -rc4 (sans the
benchmarking bits, which still need more work) and applied them to
tip:x86/fpu and have pushed them out, so that it gets more testing,
Hey Ingo,
This throws a warning if I try to run one of my MPX programs:
> [ 22.907739] [ cut here ]
> [ 22.907776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 500 at
> /home/davehans/linux.git/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:324
> fpu__activate_stopped+0x87/0x90()
> [ 22.907836] Modules linke
[Second part of the series - Gmail didn't like me sending so many mails.]
Over the past 10 years the x86 FPU has organically grown into
somewhat of a spaghetti monster that few (if any) kernel
developers understand and which code few people enjoy to hack.
Many people suggested over the years that
[Second part of the series - Gmail didn't like me sending so many mails.]
Over the past 10 years the x86 FPU has organically grown into
somewhat of a spaghetti monster that few (if any) kernel
developers understand and which code few people enjoy to hack.
Many people suggested over the years that
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 83 files changed, 3742 insertions(+), 2841 deletions(-)
>
> How much of this is just the added instrumentation? [...]
Half of it is that, plus a lot of comments.
> [...] Because that's almost a thousand new lin
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 83 files changed, 3742 insertions(+), 2841 deletions(-)
How much of this is just the added instrumentation? Because that's
almost a thousand new lines, which makes me unhappy. The *last* thing
we want is to make this thing bigger. I'm not conv
[Take #2 - sorry!]
Over the past 10 years the x86 FPU has organically grown into
somewhat of a spaghetti monster that few (if any) kernel
developers understand and which code few people enjoy to hack.
Many people suggested over the years that it needs a major cleanup,
and some time ago I went "wh
Over the past 10 years the x86 FPU has organically grown into
somewhat of a spaghetti monster that few (if any) kernel
developers understand and which code few people enjoy to hack.
Many people suggested over the years that it needs a major cleanup,
and some time ago I went "what the heck" and sta
11 matches
Mail list logo
