On 4/16/07, James Lentini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I'm interested in understanding why the reluctance to push for a merge
> now (let alone some months ago) given the various successes that have
> been seen with the NFS/RDMA effort (Sandia, SC '06, a
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 4/13/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> > > core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transp
On 4/13/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport
> Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in
Mike Snitzer wrote:
On 4/13/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
>> support
>> > > in the NFS server.
>> > > They are *no
Mike Snitzer wrote:
On 4/13/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
>> support
>> > > in the NFS server.
>> > > They are *no
On 4/13/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
>> support
>> > > in the NFS server.
>> > > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but sh
Mike Snitzer wrote:
On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
support
> > in the NFS server.
> > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>
> Out of curiousity, does this patch series
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport
> Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in mainline. Could
> you, or others, please clarify the pla
On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support
> > in the NFS server.
> > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>
> Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta betwe
Roland Dreier wrote:
> They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support
> in the NFS server.
> They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words do
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:02:24AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> NFS/RDMA is IMO more than a little bit questionable, and the likely
> userbase is also quite small. I'm not sure its worth a mainline merge
> at this point.
Why do you think so? In my eyes it's actually one of the few useful
applic
Roland Dreier wrote:
> They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support
> in the NFS server.
> They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words do
On Thursday February 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support
> > in the NFS server.
> > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>
> Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
> NFS/RDMA tree
> They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support
> in the NFS server.
> They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words does this bring
NFS/RDMA
Hi Andrew,
could you please remove
knfsd-sunrpc-update-internal-api-separate-pmap-register-and-temp-sockets.patch
knfsd-sunrpc-allow-creating-an-rpc-service-without-registering-with-portmapper.patch
knfsd-sunrpc-cache-remote-peers-address-in-svc_sock.patch
knfsd-sunrpc-use-sockaddr_storage-to-sto
15 matches
Mail list logo
