On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jan 7 2008 17:10, Vince Fuller wrote:
> >--- net/ipv4/devinet.c.orig 2007-04-12 10:16:23.0 -0700
> >+++ net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-01-07 16:55:59.0 -0800
> >@@ -594,6 +594,8 @@ static __inline__ int inet_abc
On Jan 7 2008 17:10, Vince Fuller wrote:
>--- net/ipv4/devinet.c.orig2007-04-12 10:16:23.0 -0700
>+++ net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-01-07 16:55:59.0 -0800
>@@ -594,6 +594,8 @@ static __inline__ int inet_abc_len(__be3
> rc = 16;
> else if (IN_CLASSC
On Jan 11 2008 17:49, David Miller wrote:
>From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800
>
>> I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
>> patches.
>
>Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
>your patch and respin it
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800), Vince
Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> #define IN_MULTICAST_NET 0xF000
>
> +#define IN_CLASSE(a) long int) (a)) & 0xf000) == 0xf000)
> +#define IN_CLASSE_NET 0xff00
> +#
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)),
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
>
> > There is no positive consesus on this draft
> > at the intarea meeting in Van
From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800
> I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
> patches.
Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
your patch and respin it against current sources as I asked
of you.
I'll a
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
> There is no positive consesus on this draft
> at the intarea meeting in Vancouver, right?
>
> We cannot / should not enable that space until we have reached
> a consensus on it.
This is so incredibly
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:17:02PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> > (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:17:02 +0100), Andi Kleen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> > (aka "class-E") addre
Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
> draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
Wouldn't it be wise to at least wait for
From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800
> from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
> draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
>
>
from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
Signed-off-by: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- include/linux/in.h.orig 2007-
12 matches
Mail list logo
