On 14/05/18 11:15, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
>> two separate include files for autofs.
>
> Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually?
>
>> ---
On 14/05/18 11:15, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
>> two separate include files for autofs.
>
> Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually?
>
>> ---
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
> two separate include files for autofs.
Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually?
> --- a/fs/compat_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/compat_ioctl.c
> @@
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
> two separate include files for autofs.
Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually?
> --- a/fs/compat_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/compat_ioctl.c
> @@
The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
two separate include files for autofs.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h |2
fs/compat_ioctl.c |1
include/uapi/linux/auto_fs.h | 169
The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
two separate include files for autofs.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h |2
fs/compat_ioctl.c |1
include/uapi/linux/auto_fs.h | 169
6 matches
Mail list logo