Hi,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Coly Li wrote:
> On 22/12/2017 10:32 PM, Dongsu Park wrote:
> Hi Dongsu,
>
> Could you please use a macro like NO_PERMISSION_CHECK to replace hard
> coded 0 ? At least for me, I don't need to check what does 0 mean in the
> new lookup_bdev().
I see. I'll do t
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 03:32:25PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> From: Seth Forshee
>
> When looking up a block device by path no permission check is
> done to verify that the user has access to the block device inode
> at the specified path. In some cases it may be necessary to
> check permissions
On 22/12/2017 10:32 PM, Dongsu Park wrote:
> From: Seth Forshee
>
> When looking up a block device by path no permission check is
> done to verify that the user has access to the block device inode
> at the specified path. In some cases it may be necessary to
> check permissions towards the inode
From: Seth Forshee
When looking up a block device by path no permission check is
done to verify that the user has access to the block device inode
at the specified path. In some cases it may be necessary to
check permissions towards the inode, such as allowing
unprivileged users to mount block de
4 matches
Mail list logo
