On 5/23/2018 1:47 AM, Keerthy wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2018 03:59 PM, Keerthy wrote:
[..]
Instead of this indirect method , why can't just check the previous
deep sleep mode and based on that do copy or not. EMIF power status
register should have something like that ?
I will check if w
On Monday 16 April 2018 03:59 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 12 April 2018 10:14 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
>> On 4/11/18 9:53 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>> From: Dave Gerlach
>>>
>>> After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
>>> in sram are lost. We
On Thursday 12 April 2018 10:14 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
> On 4/11/18 9:53 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>> From: Dave Gerlach
>>
>> After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
>> in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
>> code in DDR con
On Thursday 12 April 2018 10:14 PM, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
> On 4/11/18 9:53 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>> From: Dave Gerlach
>>
>> After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
>> in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
>> code in DDR con
On 4/11/18 9:53 PM, Keerthy wrote:
From: Dave Gerlach
After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
code in DDR contains the same first byte as the code in sram, and if
they do not match we know we have
From: Dave Gerlach
After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
code in DDR contains the same first byte as the code in sram, and if
they do not match we know we have lost context and must recopy the
func
6 matches
Mail list logo