Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-03 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:54:29AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: [..] > > - return cfqg->service_trees[wl][ASYNC_WORKLOAD].count > > - + cfqg->service_trees[wl][SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD].count > > - + cfqg->service_trees[wl][SYNC_WORKLOAD].count; > > + return cfqg->service_trees[wl_c

Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-02 Thread Tejun Heo
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:32:42PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Currently CFQ has three IO classes, RT, BE and IDLE. At many a places we > are calling workloads belonging to these classes as "prio". This gets > very confusing as one starts to associate it with ioprio. > > So this patch just does bu

Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-01 Thread Jeff Moyer
Vivek Goyal writes: > Currently CFQ has three IO classes, RT, BE and IDLE. At many a places we > are calling workloads belonging to these classes as "prio". This gets > very confusing as one starts to associate it with ioprio. > > So this patch just does bunch of renaming so that reading code bec

[PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-01 Thread Vivek Goyal
Currently CFQ has three IO classes, RT, BE and IDLE. At many a places we are calling workloads belonging to these classes as "prio". This gets very confusing as one starts to associate it with ioprio. So this patch just does bunch of renaming so that reading code becomes easier. All reference to R