Re: [PATCH 01/16 v3] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series of longs

2019-05-28 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:58:26AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2019 05:50:43 -0400 > Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:16:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > > > > > In order to make it possible to have multiple call

Re: [PATCH 01/16 v3] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series of longs

2019-05-28 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 28 May 2019 05:50:43 -0400 Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:16:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > > > In order to make it possible to have multiple callbacks registered with the > > function_graph tracer, the retstack needs to be

Re: [PATCH 01/16 v3] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series of longs

2019-05-28 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:16:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > In order to make it possible to have multiple callbacks registered with the > function_graph tracer, the retstack needs to be converted from an array of > ftrace_ret_stack structures to an array

[PATCH 01/16 v3] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series of longs

2019-05-24 Thread Steven Rostedt
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" In order to make it possible to have multiple callbacks registered with the function_graph tracer, the retstack needs to be converted from an array of ftrace_ret_stack structures to an array of longs. This will allow to store the list of callbacks on the stack for