On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> There are two callers to the function isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() and
> both instances use a nested if statement to only change the chip state
> if it is not in the proper mode. This patch moves this check into the
> isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() function to
On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> There are two callers to the function isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() and
> both instances use a nested if statement to only change the chip state
> if it is not in the proper mode. This patch moves this check into the
> isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() function to
There are two callers to the function isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() and
both instances use a nested if statement to only change the chip state
if it is not in the proper mode. This patch moves this check into the
isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() function to remove the nested if
statements.
Signed-off-by:
There are two callers to the function isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() and
both instances use a nested if statement to only change the chip state
if it is not in the proper mode. This patch moves this check into the
isl29028_set_als_ir_mode() function to remove the nested if
statements.
Signed-off-by:
4 matches
Mail list logo
