> Hi Andrew
>
> I found here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20201218105538.30563-2-rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk/
>
> Seem to be underway but stable isn't included, I think it should be.
Stable should happen, since this was posted with [net,v2,3/3]. David
or Jakub handles
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:33 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:17:42PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > > All the buffers and registers are
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:17:42PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > All the buffers and registers are already set up appropriately for an
> > > MTU slightly above 1500,
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > All the buffers and registers are already set up appropriately for an
> > MTU slightly above 1500, so we just need to expose this to the
> > networking stack. AFAICT,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> All the buffers and registers are already set up appropriately for an
> MTU slightly above 1500, so we just need to expose this to the
> networking stack. AFAICT, there's no need to implement .ndo_change_mtu
> when the receive
All the buffers and registers are already set up appropriately for an
MTU slightly above 1500, so we just need to expose this to the
networking stack. AFAICT, there's no need to implement .ndo_change_mtu
when the receive buffers are always set up to support the max_mtu.
This fixes several
6 matches
Mail list logo
